Jessie Popes Attitude toward War in the Poem Whos For the Game Essay

Jessie Pope was a journalist who wrote recruitment poems for the Daily Mail during the First World War. The poems she did write were positive propaganda poems for the war her objective was to mother patriotism in the readers so that the men would join the forces. Pope wrote a persuasive poem where she compared war to a game. This is illustrated in the title Whos for the game? It shows that her locating toward war was that it was a great big event that everyone should take part in one way or a nonher. The title is a short and punchy examination inviting anyone to answer. This gives the wrong impression of the war, it is misleading. Pope was ridiculed for doing this, but if she did write the actual reality of war, no one would really want to join, therefore the aim of the poem would not be fulfilled and the British army would have no chance of wining in the war. Stanza one begins again by referring to the war as a game for the supra reason and also emph asises that it is the biggest game ever known, war is not a game where you may loose points but where it is likely to loose a offshoot or loose your life. By her saying war it the game, the biggest thats played, Jessie Pope gives a false notion in the first line and makes war sound rummy when clearly it is not. The game is then repeated to enforce excitement even more. Pope goes on to imply it could be a violent game, appealing to the masculine soul whilst there is a comparison between the red crashing game and the red blood shed in war, she makes it seem like a boxing match. Jessie Pope continues to can the poem on a game by stating Wholl grip and tackle t... ...nza because she personalises it in other ways by commanding them to join to rescue their country, do to its call for help and using you. In conclusion it is a very simple and assertive poem that was popular with the general public as Jessie Popes writing contained the normal indifferent publics view that supported the war from the safety of their home. The poem, Whos for the game? were disliked by some for the misleading remarks but also admired by others for the basic language which was easy for all to comprehend. The attitudes expressed in the poem were that war should not be treated as a serious and avoided clear but something that should be enjoyed by courageous men willing to fight for their country without hesitation and men who were not eager to join were considered cowards and should be ashamed.